Saturday, February 17, 2007

dreaming from the chin up

the ones in Russian began with a vengeance as soon as i got back from winter break. i attribute their delay (based on comparison with other intervals between starting the study of a language and its infiltration of my nights' activities) to my general lack of exerted effort during autumn quarter and, i must admit, a certain resistance to the whole Russian enterprise. apparently, this latter also worked its way into the dreaming enterprise. let me give you a little taste of the joy.

early in January, i was beset by these nightly dramas in which my speaking of Russian was almost secondary. what was obviously paramount was the fact that i was consistently doing so both badly and, i might add (if we accept the hypothesis of dreams as will-fulfillment), willfully badly. as i functioned in the RSL dream-world, i persisted in pronouncing things "correctly," which is to say: according to the written vowels, instead of the 5344402 caveats governing them, such as "a=b iff x ≥ 2a —-√b, where x is a syllabic function and a and b are vowels." in linking strings of verbs, i continually used a brilliant bit of That Language construction ("da"), albeit with the spoken actions in their Russian variety. needless to say, in each of these cases (and others i shall leave for your imaginary salivation), some villainous manifestation of my super-ego never failed to show up just in time to correct me, repeatedly and adamantly.

we dream both our hopes and our capacity; none demonstrate this synthesis better than language dreams. once upon a time, i wrote an essay in Czech about how Freud was wrong for the very reason that he couldn't adequately account for such ones. my teacher was not confused by the grammar, shall we say.... while i don't exactly remember what i wrote, i know that it is this central mystery that has remained focal through the years since then: that if we could fulfill our wishes in dreams, we would, simply, speak perfectly in other languages therein. that we cannot do so, that our faults and lacks we carry with us (along with—along with—our ardent desire to communicate, to phrase in parallel, in quadruplicate), indicates that we cannot even represent some of our deepest wishes. then again, perhaps we can: perhaps our wish is not to speak like the finest of broken crystals in the shrouds before dawn, but to speak at all—and for this speech to be contiguous and contingent upon a recogniseable open-eyed reality.

as time has slipped by, as i have begun to actually study for exams and quizzes, my guards have begun to slip. this is not to say that i like Russian any better, or even that i'm making the great linguistic strides i have (often within very constrained spans of time) in the past. but perhaps i have subconsciously accepted the same facilitative argument i use in waking life—except that, instead of involving making headway towards and then staying afloat in a Slavic department, by night, the rationale is far more speculatively a matter of life and death.

this from last night, in Russian:
"thought of changing your name?" he asked me; i thought about it whenever i talked with Raskolnikov's mother and sister.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

"As though ordinary language were somehow too course and material for what we were trying to say..." LW

The linguistic dreamscape you paint is fascinating, a. Parallel to your suggestion that we dream our "capacity" might be the "fact" that we so rarely dream "new" thoughts, or "real" solutions. At least, not before interpretation...

Inaccessibility was never for me an accusation, a. After all, the question would remain as to what was being reached for.

a said...

yes and no, barnes. we do dream "real" solutions—all the time—precisely because they are not "new," but, instead, re-orderings of ageless principles, concepts, and facts. the interpretation thereof, moreover, is contained within the dream. whereas you suggest that it, as a secondary activity (presumably done waking—and awoken by the light of reason's language, as opposed to that of dreams), can (at least potentially) render something new (ie. "efficacious"?) from the limitation of dream, i maintain that such interpretation is but another act of the identical mind, acting with continuity whenever it does so. this is my meaning of "capacity," which remains constant through dreams and wakefulness, precisely because, in each, we "merely" (which i would pronounce "miraculously!") shuffle around the same bits. that our arms are only so long does not seem to prove a combinatoric liability.

Anonymous said...

A fascinating response, a. I realise now that there may have been some clumsiness in my comment.

I was trying to suggest that when the "light of reason" is superimposed upon the dreamscape (the analyst serves as an obvious example of such a superimposition), the expressionist and freeform dreamscape is inevitably "contaminated" by reason.


I have a number of thoughts to blurt out, based upon your intiguing response. If they were to be even partially addressed in a comment or in a future post, I would be delighted. If not, life would inevitably go on...

Is the theory of relativity a "real solution?" More importantly, would it be dreamable?

Are dreams out of bounds to "reason's language?"

The notion of reordering "ageless principles" rings alarm bells. What if those age principles were misguided? How ageless are they?

Anonymous said...

" those ageLESS" in the third point, obviously...